Maxime Saada, the CEO and Chair of Canal+, has taken a firm stance against the signatories of the 'Time To Switch-Off Bolloré' petition, an open letter that criticized Vincent Bolloré's growing influence in the French entertainment and media sectors. Saada's response, delivered at the Canal+ Group's annual producers' lunch during the Cannes Film Festival, was a clear signal that he is not willing to compromise on the independence and diversity of Canal+.
The petition, signed by 600 cinema professionals, including renowned directors and actors, expressed concerns about Bolloré's expansion strategy, particularly the acquisition of a 34% stake in UGC, a major French production, distribution, and exhibition company. The letter warned that this move could lead to a right-wing, reactionary agenda being pushed in France.
Saada's reaction was strong and personal. He stated that he would no longer collaborate with the signatories, calling their actions an injustice to the dedicated Canal+ teams. He also pointed out the signatories' use of the term 'crypto-fascist' to describe Canal+, which he deemed unacceptable. This reaction highlights Saada's commitment to protecting Canal+'s reputation and the values it stands for.
The tension between Saada and the signatories is not new. The petition comes amidst growing concerns about Bolloré's influence, especially in the media and publishing sectors. Bolloré's control of Vivendi, the parent company of Canal+, has led to accusations of shifting the news channel CNews and talk shows on C8 to the right. The Bolloré Group's involvement in the publishing house Hachette Livre and the appointment of far-right journalists further fuel these concerns.
The 'Time To Switch-Off Bolloré' petition received a mixed response, with some suggesting that Canal+'s cinema activities are not yet headed in a far-right direction. However, the signatories fear that Bolloré's control of the financial chain could lead to a homogenization of films and a fascist takeover of the collective imagination. This sentiment is echoed in the petition, which calls for a movement to defend independence and freedom in the industry.
Saada's threat to cut ties with the signatories is unlikely to improve relations. The petition's organizers reported that many professionals agreed with its sentiments but were hesitant to sign due to potential repercussions. This hesitation underscores the delicate balance between expressing dissent and maintaining professional integrity.
In conclusion, Saada's response to the petition is a reflection of his determination to safeguard Canal+'s independence and diversity. The ongoing tensions between Saada and the signatories highlight the complex dynamics within the French media and entertainment industries, where the influence of powerful figures like Bolloré continues to shape the landscape.
